> ## Documentation Index
> Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://docs.crazygoldfish.com/llms.txt
> Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.

# Workflow

> Step-by-step flow for AI-powered assignment evaluation – from multi-modal submissions to feedback, re-evaluation, and downstream Personalization.

<Info>
  The Assignment Evaluation Suite extends CrazyGoldFish’s **Evaluation Layer** to daily classroom work. It evaluates **handwritten, digital, audio, and video submissions**, provides interactive feedback, and powers downstream **Personalization** and **AI Studio**.
</Info>

## Step-by-Step Flow

<Steps>
  <Step title="Ingest Submissions (Upstream)">
    Upload assignments in **multiple formats**: handwritten scans, typed docs, audio, or video.\
    Attach the relevant **Model Answer and/or Rubric** for evaluation.
  </Step>

  <Step title="Configure Evaluation">
    Choose grading method: **Model-Answer**, **Rubric**, or both.\
    Add assignment metadata (subject, marks, completion date).
  </Step>

  <Step title="Run AI Evaluation">
    Trigger the **finalize** step → AI parses multi modal inputs and applies selected grading logic.\
    Optimized for **quick turnaround** to fit daily workflows.
  </Step>

  <Step title="Feedback & Re-Evaluation">
    Generate **detailed feedback JSON** with strengths + areas for improvement.\
    Students can query results, triggering **re-checks** with audit logs.
  </Step>

  <Step title="Publish & Export (Outputs)">
    Publish feedback + results to students and teachers.\
    Export **PDF/CSV summaries** and update LMS/ERP dashboards.\
    Data flows downstream into the **Personalization Suite** for reteach strategies.
  </Step>
</Steps>

***

## FAQ

<script
  type="application/ld+json"
  dangerouslySetInnerHTML={{
__html: JSON.stringify(
{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "FAQPage",
"mainEntity": [
    {
        "@type": "Question",
        "name": "How do I ingest multi-modal assignment submissions and attach grading context in the Assignment Evaluation Suite?",
        "acceptedAnswer": {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "Use the Ingest Submissions step to upload handwritten scans, typed documents, audio, or video. Attach the relevant Model Answer and/or Rubric so the evaluation engine has the grading context it needs for each submission."
        }
    },
    {
        "@type": "Question",
        "name": "Can I choose Model-Answer, Rubric, or a hybrid approach when configuring assignment evaluation?",
        "acceptedAnswer": {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "Yes. In Configure Evaluation, select Model-Answer, Rubric, or both—hybrid grading applies rubric criteria alongside the model answer for consistency on subjective work. This selection drives how the AI interprets responses during scoring."
        }
    },
    {
        "@type": "Question",
        "name": "What assignment metadata should I provide, and how is it used across the workflow?",
        "acceptedAnswer": {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "Add subject, marks, and completion date during Configure Evaluation. This metadata contextualizes results for publishing, powers PDF/CSV summaries, and helps your LMS/ERP dashboards present assignment-level insights consistently."
        }
    },
    {
        "@type": "Question",
        "name": "What happens during the finalize step in Run AI Evaluation for assignments?",
        "acceptedAnswer": {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "Trigger the finalize step to start AI processing—CrazyGoldFish parses the multi-modal inputs and applies your chosen grading logic (Model-Answer, Rubric, or hybrid). The flow is optimized for quick turnaround so it fits daily classroom cycles."
        }
    },
    {
        "@type": "Question",
        "name": "What does the feedback JSON include for evaluated assignments, and how is it used?",
        "acceptedAnswer": {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "The system generates a detailed feedback JSON highlighting strengths and areas for improvement for each student. It underpins interactive feedback experiences and feeds downstream systems like the Personalization Suite to target reteach strategies."
        }
    },
    {
        "@type": "Question",
        "name": "How are student queries and re-checks handled, and are audit logs maintained?",
        "acceptedAnswer": {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "Students can query their results, which triggers re-evaluation flows with audit logs for transparency. These logs help institutions track what changed and why, supporting a human-in-the-loop review process where educators retain oversight."
        }
    },
    {
        "@type": "Question",
        "name": "What publish and export options are available, and how do results reach LMS/ERP dashboards?",
        "acceptedAnswer": {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "Publish feedback and results to students and teachers directly from the workflow. Export PDF/CSV summaries and sync standardized outputs to LMS/ERP dashboards so scores and feedback are visible in your existing systems."
        }
    },
    {
        "@type": "Question",
        "name": "How does assignment evaluation data flow into downstream personalization and content generation?",
        "acceptedAnswer": {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "Assignment outputs feed into the Personalization Suite to generate reteach strategies based on detected gaps. The same signals can power AI Studio for curriculum-aligned content, creating a closed loop from evaluation to action."
        }
    },
    {
        "@type": "Question",
        "name": "Is the Assignment Evaluation Suite optimized for daily classroom turnaround, and what enables that speed?",
        "acceptedAnswer": {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "Yes. The workflow streamlines steps—ingestion, configuration, and a single finalize trigger—so multi-modal evaluation runs quickly without manual bottlenecks, fitting everyday assignment cycles."
        }
    },
    {
        "@type": "Question",
        "name": "How does this assignment workflow align with accuracy, review, and compliance expectations?",
        "acceptedAnswer": {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "Re-evaluation with audit logs keeps the process transparent for assignments, and educators can stay human-in-the-loop for critical checks. Across CrazyGoldFish’s Evaluation Layer, workflows are CBSE/ICSE/GDPR aligned and designed to target about 95% accuracy on rubric/model-answer tasks, extending those safeguards to daily classroom work."
        }
    }
]
}
)
}}
/>

<AccordionGroup>
  <Accordion title="How do I ingest multi-modal assignment submissions and attach grading context in the Assignment Evaluation Suite?">
    Use the Ingest Submissions step to upload handwritten scans, typed documents, audio, or video. Attach the relevant Model Answer and/or Rubric so the evaluation engine has the grading context it needs for each submission.
  </Accordion>

  <Accordion title="Can I choose Model-Answer, Rubric, or a hybrid approach when configuring assignment evaluation?">
    Yes. In Configure Evaluation, select Model-Answer, Rubric, or both—hybrid grading applies rubric criteria alongside the model answer for consistency on subjective work. This selection drives how the AI interprets responses during scoring.
  </Accordion>

  <Accordion title="What assignment metadata should I provide, and how is it used across the workflow?">
    Add subject, marks, and completion date during Configure Evaluation. This metadata contextualizes results for publishing, powers PDF/CSV summaries, and helps your LMS/ERP dashboards present assignment-level insights consistently.
  </Accordion>

  <Accordion title="What happens during the finalize step in Run AI Evaluation for assignments?">
    Trigger the finalize step to start AI processing—CrazyGoldFish parses the multi-modal inputs and applies your chosen grading logic (Model-Answer, Rubric, or hybrid). The flow is optimized for quick turnaround so it fits daily classroom cycles.
  </Accordion>

  <Accordion title="What does the feedback JSON include for evaluated assignments, and how is it used?">
    The system generates a detailed feedback JSON highlighting strengths and areas for improvement for each student. It underpins interactive feedback experiences and feeds downstream systems like the Personalization Suite to target reteach strategies.
  </Accordion>

  <Accordion title="How are student queries and re-checks handled, and are audit logs maintained?">
    Students can query their results, which triggers re-evaluation flows with audit logs for transparency. These logs help institutions track what changed and why, supporting a human-in-the-loop review process where educators retain oversight.
  </Accordion>

  <Accordion title="What publish and export options are available, and how do results reach LMS/ERP dashboards?">
    Publish feedback and results to students and teachers directly from the workflow. Export PDF/CSV summaries and sync standardized outputs to LMS/ERP dashboards so scores and feedback are visible in your existing systems.
  </Accordion>

  <Accordion title="How does assignment evaluation data flow into downstream personalization and content generation?">
    Assignment outputs feed into the Personalization Suite to generate reteach strategies based on detected gaps. The same signals can power AI Studio for curriculum-aligned content, creating a closed loop from evaluation to action.
  </Accordion>

  <Accordion title="Is the Assignment Evaluation Suite optimized for daily classroom turnaround, and what enables that speed?">
    Yes. The workflow streamlines steps—ingestion, configuration, and a single finalize trigger—so multi-modal evaluation runs quickly without manual bottlenecks, fitting everyday assignment cycles.
  </Accordion>

  <Accordion title="How does this assignment workflow align with accuracy, review, and compliance expectations?">
    Re-evaluation with audit logs keeps the process transparent for assignments, and educators can stay human-in-the-loop for critical checks. Across CrazyGoldFish’s Evaluation Layer, workflows are CBSE/ICSE/GDPR aligned and designed to target about 95% accuracy on rubric/model-answer tasks, extending those safeguards to daily classroom work.
  </Accordion>
</AccordionGroup>
