The Assignment Evaluation Suite extends the Evaluation Layer to daily classroom work. It automates rubric + model-answer grading across text, handwriting, audio, and video, while feeding downstream into Personalization and AI Studio.
Core Capabilities
-
Rubric + Model-Answer Grading
Apply detailed rubric criteria or model-answer comparisons to evaluate assignments fairly. -
Multi-modal Input Support
Evaluate handwritten submissions, typed documents, and video presentations. -
Interactive Feedback System
Generate detailed feedback, handle student queries, and enable re-evaluations to support learning. -
Classroom Workflow Integration
Designed for daily assignments with quick turnaround, helping teachers respond rapidly. -
Transparent & Auditable
Track evaluation history with re-checks, audit trails, and compliance-ready documentation.
Supported Modalities
- ✅ Handwritten documents (PDF/images)
- ✅ Typed/digital text responses
- ✅ Diagrams and visuals
- ✅ Video presentations
K-12 Assignment Ecosystem
Stakeholder Value
- Students → Receive fast, detailed feedback on daily work.
- Teachers → Save hours weekly, with insights into class-wide misconceptions.
- Leaders → Monitor assignment completion, feedback cycles, and learning trends.
- Parents → Get simple summaries of assignment performance to support learning at home.
Developer & UI Options
- REST/JSON API for backend integration into LMS/ERP.
- Embeddable UI modules to plug assignment workflows directly into platforms without heavy dev effort.
Ecosystem Integration
- Upstream: Assignment submission uploads (handwritten, digital, audio, video).
- Downstream: Results flow into the Personalization Suite (reteach strategies, practice packs), then into AI Studio for worksheet and remedial content generation.
- Continuous Loop: Observation signals from ClassTrack refine future assignments.
Next Steps
- Learn the step-by-step process in the Workflow guide.
- Explore practical Use Cases for Schools, Tutoring, LMS/ERP, and E-learning.
FAQ
Which modalities does the Assignment Evaluation Suite support, and what artifacts does it return?
Which modalities does the Assignment Evaluation Suite support, and what artifacts does it return?
Assignment evaluates typed documents, scanned handwriting, diagrams, audio, and video. It applies rubric or model‑answer logic and returns structured artifacts—scores, feedback JSON, and annotated copies—optimized for classroom and LMS/ERP workflows. These outputs are designed to be explainable, auditable, and immediately usable downstream.
How does rubric‑ or model‑answer–based grading work across essays, handwriting, diagrams, audio, and video?
How does rubric‑ or model‑answer–based grading work across essays, handwriting, diagrams, audio, and video?
Submissions are mapped to configurable rubrics or model answers so the same criteria apply across modalities. The system produces rubric‑aware scores and explanations, along with annotated copies for transparency. Educators can calibrate rubrics to board standards and refine over time without ML expertise.
What does human‑in‑the‑loop look like in Assignment—reviews, rechecks, and overrides?
What does human‑in‑the‑loop look like in Assignment—reviews, rechecks, and overrides?
Teachers and reviewers can approve, edit, or recheck results before publishing, preserving educator control on subjective items. Every action is tracked with audit logs and step‑wise marking, and you can use provisional/final publication states. This workflow keeps quality high while maintaining operational speed.
What accuracy safeguards does Assignment provide for subjective grading and edge cases?
What accuracy safeguards does Assignment provide for subjective grading and edge cases?
Assignment targets up to 95% accuracy using rubric‑aware scoring and cross‑checks, then adds a human‑in‑the‑loop review for nuanced responses. Edge cases can be flagged for quick validation or re‑evaluation, with versioned changes captured in audit trails. This balance delivers reliable outcomes without losing teacher judgment.
How do Assignment results feed into Student Action Plans and AI Studio for remediation?
How do Assignment results feed into Student Action Plans and AI Studio for remediation?
Evaluation outputs—scores, feedback JSON, and annotated copies—flow directly into Student Action Plans to group misconceptions and recommend reteach strategies. The same insights power AI Studio to generate curriculum‑aligned lesson plans, worksheets, and model answers. This closes the loop from evaluate → personalize → generate with minimal manual effort.
What are the integration options for Assignment—embeddable, white‑label UI vs REST/JSON APIs?
What are the integration options for Assignment—embeddable, white‑label UI vs REST/JSON APIs?
You can launch fast with a white‑label, embeddable UI or integrate via REST/JSON APIs for deeper control. Typical integrations are designed for 24h integration and require no AI team, while preserving full branding and UX consistency. Both paths deliver the same pipeline and artifacts (scores, feedback JSON, annotated copies).
Does Assignment handle scanned PDFs/images and complex diagrams in addition to typed responses?
Does Assignment handle scanned PDFs/images and complex diagrams in addition to typed responses?
Yes. Assignment ingests scanned exam sheets (images/PDFs) and diagrams alongside typed responses, handwriting, audio, and video. All are evaluated against rubric or model‑answer logic so results remain consistent across formats.
How does Assignment handle compliance and curriculum alignment (CBSE/ICSE/GDPR) for grading and reports?
How does Assignment handle compliance and curriculum alignment (CBSE/ICSE/GDPR) for grading and reports?
Workflows, reports, and generated materials are CBSE/ICSE/GDPR aligned, with export‑ready reports and audit trails for inspections. Configurable retention and mappings help you fit board standards while maintaining privacy‑by‑design practices. This ensures grading and publication stay compliant across boards and regions.
How do we configure rubrics, model answers, and publication states across boards and regions?
How do we configure rubrics, model answers, and publication states across boards and regions?
Rubrics and model answers are configurable to match CBSE/ICSE mappings and local standards, and can be tuned per subject or grade. Reviewers can enforce provisional/final publication states and recheck policies within the human‑in‑the‑loop flow. These controls keep outcomes consistent and governance‑ready at scale.
What controls support rollouts at scale—roles, audits, and data flows in Assignment?
What controls support rollouts at scale—roles, audits, and data flows in Assignment?
Assignment supports role‑based access, audit logs, and exportable reports to standardize governance. Results can be published to your LMS/ERP, and downstream workflows (Action Plans, AI Studio) stay aligned with board policies. This makes large deployments transparent, auditable, and easy to operate without a dedicated AI team.